---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Hi Andr=E9, I almost responded to David's post but thought better of it but now I will.= =20 A little. Goodness knows, as Ric stated, much has been written about his Touchweight= =20 Metrology on the list also, but I never really thought of that as "promoting" his=20 "product"! I thought of it a way that had not been available before for a tech to improve= a problem action. Just as with your "product", if it will enable us to turn out better, more= =20 consistent, etc. regulating jobs, why not promote it? Especially for those of us who do= =20 a good bit of so-called high-end regulating work for various artists & teachers, and=20 it'll make our job easier/better, I'm all for it. JMHO. Regards, Avery I'm going to be ordering some from Jurgen this summer, BTW. :-) At 05:35 AM 5/8/05, you wrote: >On 8-mei-05, at 9:15, David C. Stanwood wrote: > >>To be honest I think that you both should tone down your posts in respect= =20 >>to promoting your product. This list should not be used for promoting=20 >>products. >> >>David Stanwood > >Thank you for reminding us Mr Stanwood. >Of course this list is not for promoting products. My emails were actually= =20 >more a reaction to the email you sent yesterday in which you started to=20 >tell the list what you thought about the new punching. > >Andr=E9 Oorebeek > >_______________________________________________ >pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/76/6f/65/e2/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC