This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Hello Joe G and List Yes, I agree the concept was good. It was too advanced for the materials = at hand. The thing that really let it down was the early plastic. If it = were being built now they would have used a more durable plastic. I too = had one and did the same as you - got a standard keyboard made for it. = The amazing thing was those "R" shaped push-into-the-extruded frame type = flanges about which the entire design concept revolved. The odd thing = was that you could release and drop the key-board - like a "ships' = piano". There was also the thought that went into the design of the = levers. I think they used tin-snips to separate the check block arm from = the strap arm. Straps? Bridle straps were nylon cord fused into a = plastic cap to attach to that strap arm. Again, quite amazing! The tone = was quite good though, wasn't it? Amazing. Regards Michael G.(UK) ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Joe Garrett=20 To: Michael Gamble=20 Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:32 PM Subject: Re: Magnets - was Springs vs lead Michael, I know, I own one! :-( In the past I made a set of standard keys for = one. Worked out very well. However, it was one of the earlier versions, = so the action wasn't completely screwed up. On mine, I'll have to = replace the action as well. One of those "roundtoit" thingees.<G> It has = a lovely case w/matching stool.=20 I believe the concept was good, just the execution was poor.<G> = Ah.....one of these days.........<G> Regards, Joe Garrett, R.P.T. Captain, Tool Police Squares R I ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Michael Gamble=20 To: Joe Garrett ; pianotech@ptg.org=20 Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 4:21 AM Subject: Re: Magnets - was Springs vs lead Hello Joe Making the frame of welded tubular steel, action out of alloy, the = hammers out of plastic and the keys of plastic also, but with clock = springs to return them? Sorry, that's already been done .... in Ireland. = I cite: Lindtner of Shannon. When that firm went into liquidation I = believe they paid off the work-force with pianos...:-) Regards Michael G.(UK) ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Joe Garrett=20 To: pianotech=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 11:16 PM Subject: Magnets - was Springs vs lead The Michael From The Island said: "I like it! Magnetic forces - = what are the downsides?" The only one that comes to mind, is that magnets lose their = properties/strength with time. As for the lead thingee: you'd have to put one helluvalotof lead = into the system to mimic the effect of a spring, which is what pianists = are used to. Perhaps making the entire system out of iron or steel would = come close. But, still not the same sensory for the pianist. Also more = propensity for noise. :-( Just my inflated $ worth.<G> Joe Garrett, R.P.T. Captain, Tool Police Squares R I ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/a8/e1/b1/a0/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC