Damppchaser offers a "wet" hygrometer, ~55%RH if memory serves me correctly. That should be good enough for coastal climates. More than that is detrimental IMHO. Andrew At 04:42 PM 5/22/2005, you wrote: >AF wrote: > >Most of the pianos in this country are over 80 years old > >Really? Says who? I know some days it seems that way, but I don't think >that is true at all. > >and have acclimatized to a RH of 65%. > >Really? Says who? Where do you get such data from? Most environments do >not have fluctuating relative humidity levels? > >Ideally, the installation of a climate control system should maintain that >65% to avoid any damage. > >Why would a slightly drier environment cause any damage? All the wood in >that piano grew for 100 to several hundred years at something like 50% MC >(what is the moisture content of green wood?). Somebody dried it out after >they cut the darn thing down - didn't do much damage then - why would a >small change in MC damage it now? IMHO, hesitating to create a stable 42% >RH (or there abouts) environment for an old piano is nonsense. > >The Dampp Chaser literature that I have does not state whether you can set >it to maintain existing conditions, and am therefore very reluctant to >recommend the system for old instruments; new ones, fine. > >New piano, old piano, same difference, IMHO. > >Terry Farrell
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC