SAT Scores on Tuning Exam

[David Ilvedson]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment

I should say 1 cent in the temperment up to 6 cents tolerances in the e=
xtremes or something like that.
David I.




Original message
From: "David Ilvedson" 
To: pianotech@ptg.org
Received: 9/12/2005 9:56:33 PM
Subject: RE: SAT Scores on Tuning Exam


Joe,
I'm beginning to think your an idiot...if you think an aural tuning is =
going have some huge difference to an ETD tuning your nuts!   The fact =
is the Master Tuning is done aurally.   When they are done, a FAC tunin=
g will be within the tolerances of the Master tuning...1 cent I believe=
.  I suggest you take your medication...it's way overdue.


 


Original message
From: "Joe Garrett" 
To: pianotech 
Received: 9/12/2005 9:44:17 PM
Subject: SAT Scores on Tuning Exam


So I just checked with Michael Kimbell, our San Francisco CTE and tunin=
=3D
g examiner and he concurred with my statement.   
David ,
Then Michael is on Drugs, IMO. 
The simple fact remains, that the Test Instrument is tuned Aurally, by =
at least Three tuners, one of which must be a CTE. Since the piano is t=
uned Aurally, there is no way in hell, the SAT will reproduce this! I'm=
 sure if you check with Paul Brown, he'll tell you that exams, of recor=
d, do not bear out this B.S.! As for the claims of Reyburn and Veritune=
r...That smatters of the "Diaphramatic Soundboard" B.S. that we so blat=
antly poo poo, on this list almost every day. Sales Hype, IMO.
Joe Garrett, R.P.T.
Captain, Tool Police
Squares R I

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/ee/7f/31/8f/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--