SAT Scores on Tuning Exam

[Avery Todd]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Hi David,

At 11:56 PM 9/12/05, you wrote:

>Joe,
>
>I'm beginning to think you're an idiot...if you think an aural 
>tuning is going to have some huge difference to an ETD tuning, 
>you're nuts! The fact is the Master Tuning is done aurally.

Not necessarily. It only has to be VERIFIED aurally!

>When they are done, a FAC tuning will be within the tolerances of 
>the Master tuning...1 cent I believe.

Avery



>
>
>----------
>Original message
>From: "Joe Garrett"
>To: pianotech
>Received: 9/12/2005 9:44:17 PM
>Subject: SAT Scores on Tuning Exam
>
>So I just checked with Michael Kimbell, our San Francisco CTE and tunin=
>g examiner and he concurred with my statement.
>David ,
>Then Michael is on Drugs, IMO.
>The simple fact remains, that the Test Instrument is tuned Aurally, 
>by at least Three tuners, one of which must be a CTE. Since the 
>piano is tuned Aurally, there is no way in hell, the SAT will 
>reproduce this! I'm sure if you check with Paul Brown, he'll tell 
>you that exams, of record, do not bear out this B.S.! As for the 
>claims of Reyburn and Verituner...That smatters of the "Diaphramatic 
>Soundboard" B.S. that we so blatantly poo poo, on this list almost 
>every day. Sales Hype, IMO.
>Joe Garrett, R.P.T.
>Captain, Tool Police
>Squares R I

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/a8/d2/b6/2c/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--