small vs large grands

Piannaman@aol.com Piannaman@aol.com
Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:01:01 EDT


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
 
Stephen,
 
Definitely 2A.  And as Doug Knabe said,  "2. "Baby Grand" has a  very sexy 
connotation."
 
I don't know why people like saying that, but they do.  Billy Joel and  Ray 
Charles even did a duet called "My Baby Grand," or something like it.  
 
Back when I was moving pianos full time, I was asked to come and move a  
lady's "baby grand."  Turned out it was a Boesendorfer Imperial (9'  6").  People 
just automatically pair up the two words "baby" and  "grand."
 
Dave Stahl
 
People In a message dated 9/29/2005 7:10:55 PM Pacific Standard Time,  
sbirkett@real.uwaterloo.ca writes:

Two  obvious reasons:

1. cheaper
2. more  suited to domestic conditions because
(a)  smaller footprint and/or
(b) not as  loud

but it's not clear which of these is the driver, and whether  
different reasons apply to different classes of consumer.

I'll pose  a hypothetical question and short circuit reason #1: 
suppose all grands of  a particular famous make sold for the same 
amount. Would you expect reason  #2 to still drive consumers to the 
smaller grands, and if so is it (a) and  (b) that kicks in? or would 
you expect most consumers to go for the big  grands and somehow make 
them work in their domestic  circumstances?

Stephen
-- 


 

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/f8/6d/a1/0f/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC