This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment =20 Hi people,I'm trying to hone my aural tuning skills and I've come up = with a method... I'd like to hear others' feedback on this particular = method, and about any other kinds of methods you might recommend. Today I had a nice tuning in a quiet house. It was a Yamaha Grand, a C3 in good shape. So I took the opportunity to "keep score" on my aural tuning. I used Potter F-A II. What I did was: 1. Take F-A-C readings and let the SAT calculate a tuning. 2. Set the A4 with the machine. 3. Tune the temperament by ear from there. 4. Compare my note with the machine's calculation. 5. Write down how far off I was (in cents). 6. Re-tune with machine and go to the next note, lather, rinse and repeat. Here's my scorecard: A3: -.1 F3: -.2 F4: +.9 C#4: -.8 D4: dead on! A#3: -2.7, retried: -2.2. Found out D4 (where I was tuning the third from had drifted flat - gotta work on my stability!) F#3: -.5 D#4: dead on! B3: -2.8 (oops!) retry: dead on! G3: +.2 E4: -.4 C4: dead on! G#3: -.8 F#4: -.1 G4: dead on G#4: -.3 So howzzat? Not too bad, I'm thinking. My tendency looks to be that I tend to tune flat (slower beating), but I think I'll need a few more scorecards to make a statistical judgement. And I have to work on the stability thing, too, obviously. I get so caught up in the beat speeds that I lose track of that fundamental skill of setting the string and the pin. Are any of you doing practice things with your ETDs? How do you use = them? ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/37/7b/b5/68/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC