Forgive me if I'm being obtuse here, but I'm not clear on how this answers David L's question. Not that you were addressing him here, Dale, but, the question still remains for me, as David phrased it, " If the danger of too much stiffness in the treble is as you describe, why the fish? Doesn't that increase stiffness and reduce mass?" What say you all on the fish? It seems that this would be counterproductive to the, "that short sustain, screaming treble" that Ron N mentions that we are trying to avoid. Doesn't employing a fish reduce the mass that we would otherwise intend to increase? Respectfully, William R. Monroe ----- Original Message ----- From: <Erwinspiano@aol.com> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 8:32 PM Subject: Re: Rib scaling question > > Mike /Ron > Mike, Thanks for the kind comments of appreciation. > Mike this stiffness question is surely relevant to us all. How stiff is > too stiff? > I've maintained that a too stiff system yields a sustain that must be > extricated by stiffer & stiffer hammers until it's not retrievable. ie too much > bearing on an otherwise well supported belly chokes the sound > I agree with Ron, usually a safe thing to do, grin, and it's also true > in this case the extra ribs are primarily for crown support & turning them > perpendicular to the bridge & obtuse to the grain angle of the sound board > increases stiffness without adding mass. Del's/Rons have been saying this for > years now & I finally proved it to myself. > The upper part of the treble board in the last octave & half area is > quite stiff simply because the board spans an ever decreasing span between > belly rail and curve side of case. Combine this with a stiff bridge on top in the > same vicinity ands some short spruce ribs and this is going to drive the > tone. Of course adequate down bearing assumned. > Sincerely > Dale Erwin > > > > Primarily for Dale Erwin, (who was generous enough to share his thoughts > > and his photos with us all through the PTG Journal) but anyone please feel > > free to chime in if you've got thoughts on this... > > > > Most rib scale modifications I've seen / heard about involve additional > > ribs, closer together, and perpendicular to the bridge, in the treble. > > Reasons: maintain crown, increase impedence for longer sustain. I'm > > wondering how critical it is to get enough but not too much increased > > stiffness. Have you ever gone too far? What were the resulting symptoms? > > > > thanks > > > > Mike > > The addition of treble ribs is realistically more important to crown > support in the killer octave than to high treble stiffness. The > symptom of too much stiffness in the high end is that short sustain > screaming treble we talked about a couple of weeks ago. The cure is > mass to get the fundamental resonant frequency down. > > Ron N > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Dale Erwins Piano Restorations > 4721 Parker Rd. > Modesto, Ca 95357 > 209-577-8397 cell 209-985-0990 > Featuring Custom Restoration Services > & Sales Of Restored > > Steinway ,and Mason & Hamlin Pianos > www.Erwinspiano.com >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC