Slow Hammer Return

John Ross jrpiano at win.eastlink.ca
Sun Jun 4 08:30:00 MDT 2006


Anytime, I replaced them, due to the contaminated felt. I never bothered putting new felt back on.
I noticed no difference, so I don't feel it is required.
John M. Ross
Windsor, Nova Scotia, Canada.
jrpiano at win.eastlink.ca
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Michelle Smith 
  To: 'Pianotech List' 
  Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 9:43 AM
  Subject: RE: Slow Hammer Return


  A couple of people have mentioned the felt being the initial cause of hammer spring corrosion.  Should the felt be replaced as well?

   

  Thanks for everyone's help on this issue.  I feel like I can go back to the customer with some good information.

   

  Michelle

   

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Matt McWilliams
  Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 9:58 PM
  To: 'Pianotech List'
  Subject: RE: Slow Hammer Return

   

  Everett's from the 70's and 80's had a problem with the hammer springs breaking. The felt on the hammer spring rail attracted moisture and caused the strings. Probably the hammer springs need replaced.

   

  Matt McWilliams

   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20060604/a2e15c51/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC