See previous post!!!!!!! PLEASE! I have no problems with the sentiments posted, but I DO have a problem about where they're posted!!!!!!!! Avery Todd University of Houston At 08:03 PM 6/19/2006, you wrote: >We could all do with a little fear of God in this overly permissive >culture(which, by the way, is going down the tubes just like Rome >and other past civilizations) > >Wayne >----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoff Sykes" <thetuner at ivories52.com> >To: <tune4u at earthlink.net>; "'Pianotech List'" <pianotech at ptg.org> >Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 4:10 PM >Subject: RE: Gender of God, and other piano-realted stuff - ENOUGH ALREADY > > >>: Prophet (American Heritage Dictionary): The chief spokesperson of a >>movement or cause. >> >>: Apostle (American Heritage Dictionary): A passionate adherent; a strong >>supporter. >> >>: Gospel (WordNet, Princeton University): The written body of teachings of a >>(religious) group that are generally accepted by that group. >> >>OK, so I got a little picky in the definitions that I chose. But that said, >>and while agreeing that, (depending upon what the definition of "is" is), >>"God" "is", let's see if we can make this just that much sillier! Here's the >>testimony that I received: >> >>"Christians use Hell to scare people into believing what they believe. But >>to believe in something just because you're afraid of the consequences if >>you don't believe in something is no reason to believe in something." >>-- Homer Simpson >> >> >>And then --- >>Asked by Bart what his religious beliefs are, Homer answers, "You know, the >>one with all the well-meaning rules that don't work in real life. Uh, >>Christianity." >> >> >>No one would mistake Homer Simpson and his family for saints. In many ways, >>in fact, they are quintessentially weak, good-hearted sinners who rely on >>their faith -- but only when absolutely necessary. >>-- Michael Medved >> >> >>"(The Simpsons) have captured a very common understanding of who God is," >>said Glodo, of Reformed Theological Seminary. "It's a very functional view >>of religion." >> >> >> >> >>And with that, I'm running for cover. >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf >>Of Alan Barnard >>Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 12:15 PM >>To: Pianotech List >>Subject: RE: Gender of God, and other piano-realted stuff - ENOUGH ALREADY >> >> >>God ... the ultimate inconvenient, yet absolute, truth. >> >>How on earth did this silly thread get started? Why am I perpetuating it >>even one more keystroke? >> >>Oh yeah, to declare out of necessity a portion of my resolute testimony: God >>IS. You have the testimony of prophets and apostles from Adam to the present >>day and you have the absolute right and capability to receive your own >>testimony. >> >>Don't let fear stop you. >> >>Alan Barnard >>Salem, Missouri >> >>P.S. If this post offends anyone, they have my sympathy. >>----- Original Message ----- From: Geoff Sykes >>To: Pianotech List >>Sent: 06/19/2006 12:44:09 PM >>Subject: RE: Gender of God, and other piano-realted stuff - ENOUGH ALREADY >> >> >>Let's lighten up, people. If you can't follow George's proposed new third >>commandment, (see end of article), then please take this conversation to a >>forum where it is appropriate. May I suggest the following Google search: >>http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=god+male+female >> >>===================================== >> >>GEORGE CARLIN ON THE 10 COMMANDMENTS >>from "Complaints and Grievances" (HBO special) >> >>Here is my problem with the ten commandments- why exactly are there 10? >> >>You simply do not need ten. The list of ten commandments was artificially >>and deliberately inflated to get it up to ten. Here's what happened: >> >>About 5,000 years ago a bunch of religious and political hustlers got >>together to try to figure out how to control people and keep them in line. >>They knew people were basically stupid and would believe anything they were >>told, so they announced that God had given them some commandments, up on a >>mountain, when no one was around. >> >>Well let me ask you this- when they were making this s**t up, why did they >>pick 10? Why not 9 or 11? I'll tell you why- because 10 sounds official. Ten >>sounds important! Ten is the basis for the decimal system, it's a decade, >>it's a psychologically satisfying number (the top ten, the ten most wanted, >>the ten best dressed). So having ten commandments was really a marketing >>decision! It is clearly a b******t list. It's a political document >>artificially inflated to sell better. I will now show you how you can reduce >>the number of commandments and come up with a list that's a little more >>workable and logical. I am going to use the Roman Catholic version because >>those were the ones I was taught as a little boy. >> >>Let's start with the first three: >> >>I AM THE LORD THY GOD THOU SHALT NOT HAVE STRANGE GODS BEFORE ME >> >>THOU SHALT NOT TAKE THE NAME OF THE LORD THY GOD IN VAIN >> >>THOU SHALT KEEP HOLY THE SABBATH >> >>Right off the bat the first three are pure b******t. Sabbath day? Lord's >>name? strange gods? Spooky language! Designed to scare and control primitive >>people. In no way does superstitious nonsense like this apply to the lives >>of intelligent civilized humans in the 21st century. So now we're down to 7. >>Next: >> >>HONOR THY FATHER AND MOTHER >> >>Obedience, respect for authority. Just another name for controlling people. >>The truth is that obedience and respect shouldn't be automatic. They should >>be earned and based on the parent's performance. Some parents deserve >>respect, but most of them don't, period. You're down to six. >> >>Now in the interest of logic, something religion is very uncomfortable with, >>we're going to jump around the list a little bit. >> >>THOU SHALT NOT STEAL >> >>THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS >> >>Stealing and lying. Well actually, these two both prohibit the same kind of >>behavior- dishonesty. So you don't really need two you combine them and call >>the commandment "thou shalt not be dishonest". And suddenly you're down to >>5. >> >>And as long as we're combining I have two others that belong together: >> >>THOU SHALT NOT COMMIT ADULTERY >> >>THOU SHALT NOT COVET THY NEIGHBOR'S WIFE >> >>Once again, these two prohibit the same type of behavior. In this case it is >>marital infidelity. The difference is- coveting takes place in the mind. But >>I don't think you should outlaw fantasizing about someone else's wife >>because what is a guy gonna think about when he's waxing his carrot? But, >>marital infidelity is a good idea so we're gonna keep this one and call it >>"thou shalt not be unfaithful". And suddenly we're down to four. >> >>But when you think about it, honesty and infidelity are really part of the >>same overall value so, in truth, you could combine the two honesty >>commandments with the two fidelity commandments and give them simpler >>language, positive language instead of negative language and call the whole >>thing "thou shalt always be honest and faithful" and we're down to 3. >> >>THOU SHALT NOT COVET THY NEIGHBOR"S GOODS >> >>This one is just plain f****n' stupid. Coveting your neighbor's goods is >>what keeps the economy going! Your neighbor gets a vibrator that plays "o >>come o ye faithful", and you want one too! Coveting creates jobs, so leave >>it alone. You throw out coveting and you're down to 2 now- the big honesty >>and fidelity commandment and the one we haven't talked about yet: >> >>THOU SHALT NOT KILL >> >>Murder. But when you think about it, religion has never really had a big >>problem with murder. More people have been killed in the name of god than >>for any other reason. All you have to do is look at Northern Ireland, >>Cashmere, the Inquisition, the Crusades, and the World Trade Center to see >>how seriously the religious folks take thou shalt not kill. The more devout >>they are, the more they see murder as being negotiable. It depends on who's >>doin the killin' and who's gettin' killed. So, with all of this in mind, I >>give you my revised list of the two commandments: >> >>Thou shalt always be honest and faithful to the provider of thy nookie. >> >>& >> >>Thou shalt try real hard not to kill anyone, unless of course they pray to a >>different invisible man than you. >> >>Two is all you need; Moses could have carried them down the hill in his >>f****n' pocket. I wouldn't mind those folks in Alabama posting them on the >>courthouse wall, as long as they provided one additional commandment: >> >>Thou shalt keep thy religion to thyself. >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf >>Of pianotune05 at comcast.net >>Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 9:21 AM >>To: Pianotech List >>Subject: Re: Gender of God, and other piano-realted stuff..... >> >> >>Definitly faith I would attest. Now we're getting into even deeper >>theological topics which I know I'd get in trouble for discussing because >>they're not piano related. Someone else who's been a piano tech longer than >>I who isn't new might get by with it.:) All I will say is that discussing >>those who wrote Scripture then opens the door for the topic, then who truly >>wrote the Bible the people who thought the earth was flat or God inspiring >>them? I know the answer, but I'll leave it for another list. Marshall >> >>-------------- Original message -------------- From: "Robin >>Blankenship" <tunerdude at comcast.net> >> >>What evidence do you have for that assertion, Luis? Or, is this statement >>just to be taken on faith............ >> >>Robin Blankenship >>----- Original Message ----- From: LuisGalvez at aol.com >>To: pianotech at ptg.org >>Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 11:23 AM >>Subject: Re: Gender of God, and other piano-realted stuff..... >> >> >>Remember that the people who wrote the bible thought the earth was flat. >> >>Luis Antonio Galvez-Alcantara "He was deeply in love. When she spoke, he >>thought he heard bells, as if she were a garbage truck backing up." >>www.tenors.net >> >> >> >>No virus found in this incoming message. >>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/368 - Release Date: 6/16/2006 >> >> >> >>-- >>No virus found in this incoming message. >>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/368 - Release Date: 6/16/2006
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC