>Anyway, sorry for the inconvenience. I like the new format for archival reading. Before, in order to reply to a thread from the archive, I would have to copy the subject and click on the address then paste the subject to the new e-mail and change the address. Then go back to the archive to copy relevant text supporting my reply. Now it's as easy as it is was when receiving the posts directly to my 'in box'. Now I can copy relevant text for my reply (not send the entire post - hint, hint) and generate an email with one click. A fantastic upgrade. -- Regards, Jon Page PS As mentioned before, I prefer reading the list via the archive as it cuts down on the bulk to my daily mail. The majority of which is spam but now doesn't require much scrutinizing plus the option for selective reading. I would spend 30 to 45 minutes reading and sorting mail, now it takes 3 to 10 minutes. Andy scores one big ATTA-BOY -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20060305/383ee018/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC