I've never understood the convenience of the digest. Aren't all the e-mails posted in there? What's the advantage? I get them spread out. You get them all at once! Eudora catches "most" of the spam, so I guess I just don't understand what the advantage is. Avery At 10:39 AM 3/5/2006, you wrote: > >Anyway, sorry for the inconvenience. > >I like the new format for archival reading. > >Before, in order to reply to a thread from the archive, I would have >to copy the subject >and click on the address then paste the subject to the new e-mail >and change the address. >Then go back to the archive to copy relevant text supporting my reply. > >Now it's as easy as it is was when receiving the posts directly to >my 'in box'. >Now I can copy relevant text for my reply (not send the entire post >- hint, hint) >and generate an email with one click. > >A fantastic upgrade. > >-- > >Regards, > >Jon Page > >PS As mentioned before, I prefer reading the list via the archive >as it cuts down on >the bulk to my daily mail. The majority of which is spam but now >doesn't require >much scrutinizing plus the option for selective reading. I would >spend 30 to 45 minutes >reading and sorting mail, now it takes 3 to 10 minutes. > >Andy scores one big ATTA-BOY >_______________________________________________ >Pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20060305/06bf0506/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC