This makes me wonder... Do you usually have an idea of the precision of the A440 reference you use ? I mean... I didn't get any the precision information with my tuning fork, I found it on the net. I wonder what are the precisions of professional ETDs, and what precision we can expect from a pocket PC, about which I wonder if it even can be as precise as a normal PC... In fact, I have one reason to think it could even be better : since this material is intended to be as small as possible, it might be that they only contain ONE reference clock, for time, for CPU and for sound processing. Then, we could expect the sound precision to be as precise as their time clock... did any of you ever tried to check his pocket PC, against a good A440 reference, and compare the error with the time drift ? (and by the way, compare it with a desktop PC) Reminder : 0.1cent = ~0.0058% = ~5sec/day Philippe Errembault Ps : I know the buffering of cell phone is small, but this doesn't change the fact that any shift in it's clock should be retrieved in the output ! this would lead to an interresting experiment : take two cell phone, call the same tone reference and see if there is any beat between them... I would be curious about the result ! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe Errembault" <phil.errembault at skynet.be> To: "Pianotech List" <pianotech at ptg.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 12:46 AM Subject: Re: online pitch source > Ok, criticise the precision of your PCs, but do you have any idea how > precise is your tuning fork ? > I have found on the net that a steel tuning fork can be as precise as 0.05 > Hz while an aluminium one > would start a 0.2 Hz, quickly degrading to 0,5 Hz > > I think a PC with a common soundcard, playing a calibrated wave file is ... > not to be compared > with a steel fork, but probably as precise as a common aluminium fork... > > If you use tune lab after having properly calibrated it, then it can be as > precise as a steel tuning fork. > > Philippe Errembault > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sid Blum" <piano at sover.net> > To: "Pianotech List" <pianotech at ptg.org> > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 11:52 PM > Subject: RE: online pitch source > > > > All this discussion gets me to thinking oscilloscopes, microphones, > > and especially tuning forks aren't so bad after all. > > -- > > Sid Blum > > sid at sover.net > > > > > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC