Grin. Andrew you open a bucket of worms to be sure. If you want to know my experience... its that if the Steinways I've run into... like just about any other CC boarded piano are kept at reasonable RH levels... they never develop a killer octave worth commenting on. Flame suit on big time. As to whether or not the ribs are actually underdimensioned and there is not enough support from the belly rail.... This kind of depends on your perspective. From an engineering standpoint there seems to be quite a bit of consensus (at least on pianotech) that there is indeed a problem. I think its important however to remember that there are many many pianos built this way that have held up just dandy over many years. Sauters, like Steingræbers, like Seiler, like Steinway, like Bechstein, like Yamaha, like etc etc etc all use this method in one form or another. Most use curved ribs... some dry out the wood a bit more then others before ribbing... but in the end they all use what must be termed CC boards. I think you can expect the Sauter to age similiarilly. If you give it a good home the panel will get gradually flatter and the sound will mellow and loose a bit of that nice bloom... but still maintain a nice voice. If you dont... it probably will sound like mud in 15 years or so. Cheers RicB Ric, We've been enjoying a Sauter here. I hadn't looked into soundboard construction methodology. Would your description coincide with Compression Crowned and Rib supported--CC&R? It has been my understanding that the loss of sustain in the fifth and sixth octaves of Steinway pianos (New York I haven't worked with Hamburg) is due to inadequate support of the belly-rail (secondary) and inadequate rib support of the soundboard/bridge assembly in that particular area (primary) of the piano. Does that coincide with your experience? I haven't encountered and old Sauter yet to see how gracefully it ages... Andrew Anderson
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC