Perhaps simply giving more attention to grain orientation of the shank could produce better results, regard shank breakage, flex issues, and resulting tonal characteristics. Frank Emerson pianoguru at earthlink.net > [Original Message] > From: Joseph Garrett <joegarrett at earthlink.net> > To: pianotech <pianotech at ptg.org> > Date: 11/27/2006 11:40:21 AM > Subject: Re: Scruffing...was Over Strike vs Under Strike > > Ron O said:"......but there must be a > reason why the cedar shanks produced such a good tone compared with > maple ones." > Ron, > I choose to think of the wood as having different flexibility. Maple is > more flexible than Cedar, IMO. > Regards, > > > Joseph Garrett, R.P.T. > Captain, Tool Police > Squares R I > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC