That's very strange. That anyone would go to the trouble of putting a Welte into a Steinway. I'm not doubting you, but wonder if it wasn't built as a Welte ( on custom order, or in Germany ) originally. An early reproducer, perhaps. Peace, Peace, G --- william ballard <yardbird at vermontel.net> wrote: > Yo, Thump, > > On Jul 2, 2007, at 9:00 PM, gordon stelter wrote: > > My impressioin is that the Duo Art version of the > "O" > > was called an "OR". The "X" designation was only > used > > for the "M"reproducer, perhaps because "Mr" would > have > > looked a bit silly ? > > Thump > > I'm guessing the "X" is like the county hospital's > entry under > "Father of Newborn". They don't want to acknowledge > anything about > it. But you probably know more than I do about it. > If nothing else, > this piano is an "ex-" O. > > > It had (as I remember) a Welte player retro-fitted > where the Duo-Art > was. And after that that and a cheap set of hammers, > it's still a > very fine sounding O. The current pedals and lyre > are barely > functional: it really needs a Stwy lyre to be a real > piano for this > summer chamber music program. > > Thanks for replying. I the meantime, I've decided > that the keybed > stiffener plank should be solid, and that it won't > be that difficult > to locate. I'm routing out for the female locking > plate before the > plank gets attached to the keybed. Triangulation. > Nothing trickier > than, say, finding the right location for a new back > action. > > Mr. Bill > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC