The difference really is real. The array of variables is, too. Always something to do, ta-da. Paul "If you want to know the truth, stop having opinions" (Chinese fortune cookie) In a message dated 07/27/07 21:12:24 Central Daylight Time, rnossaman at cox.net writes: > David: > > Might it also be a different partial set energy carrying into the > counterbearing segment (front duplex)? I've found that changing the > strike point to achieve the sweet spot also reduces the counterbearing > "noise". Or they become one and the same--a sweet spot includes that > reduction. > > Paul This could very well be the case. I've noticed that the treble strike point target seems to get wider with a more efficient soundboard design, and elimination of a tuned front duplex in favor of a quieter shortened one. I'm not yet sure which of these changes accounts for the difference, but the difference is real. Ron N -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20070727/330081c9/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC