Steinway action noise

David Love davidlovepianos at comcast.net
Sat Nov 17 07:55:38 MST 2007


Actually as I look at Greg's picture and the color of the knuckle (very
orange)  it may be a Tokiwa.  It's easy to tell the difference by looking at
the drop screw as the Renner has a slotted type screw whereas the Tokiwa has
the more traditional flattened nipple type head (however you describe that).


 

David Love
davidlovepianos at comcast.net
www.davidlovepianos.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf
Of John Delacour
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 1:21 AM
To: Pianotech List
Subject: Re: Steinway action noise

 

At 08:19 -0500 16/11/07, Jon Page wrote:

 

Looking at my parts, there is a Hamburg flange with the drop screw
about 2 mm proximally located.  In your photo, the red leaching of the
dye into the shank around the bushing says Renner.
My NY S&S shanks have a bushing with a white center not all red.
Some Renner flanges (if I'm not mistaken) have the center about 1 mm

more distal.

 

Here is a clear picture of the shank and flange currently supplied by Renner
for the _New_York_action.  The distance from centre to middle of roller core
is advertised as 16.2mm. (Abel does 16mm.).  The standard measurement, and
that used for the Hamburg shanks, is 17mm.

 



 

Compare this with Greg's picture and you will notice not only a difference
in the wood used for the core but an apparently quite marked difference in
the position of the drop screw even allowing for parallax.  The quality of
the buckskin is also different.

 



 

And here is the new Renner shank and flange lined up with the original NY
Steinway S part.  There is almost 2mm difference in the disrance from the
roller core to the flange profile.  In other words everything is moved
inboard nearly 2 mm.  What do do?  The simplest solution is probably to pack
the lever rail with card along the top of the screws and pack the near edge
of the hammer rail to force the flanges back as far as possible -- note that
the profile has a wider central section than the original, so some
adjustment is possible without cutting away the far side of the flange.  One
way or another it is possible to reduce the error to manageable proportions,
and I've seen some pretty extreme fixes of the kind on Steinway's own work.
Nevertheless Renner need to be told that their dimensions are wrong.  And a
fat lot of difference that is likely to make!

 



 

JD

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20071117/437fbb06/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 11193 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20071117/437fbb06/attachment-0003.jpe 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 8736 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20071117/437fbb06/attachment-0004.jpe 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 11678 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20071117/437fbb06/attachment-0005.jpe 


More information about the Pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC