> > We would replace the legs with legs off a 5.1 grand > > and it would fix the problem. Maybe ask the store where it came from, > > just a thought. > > > That's an interesting fix. I wonder what the > difference is in the legs from one model size to > another..and I wonder if this holds true for all > the manufacturers.. Of the four manufacturers for whom I have worked, massive legs were used on the concert grand and sometimes on the 7', while a large, but not so massive leg was used on most other grand models. In some cases a smaller leg was use on the very smallest grand of the product line. It makes sense from a manufacturing point of view, to have as many common parts as possible among different models. As has been pointed out on this thread, some manufacturers may have gone too far in cost cutting at the low end of their line, requiring spindly legs to support entirely too much weight. The problem becomes worse when the case style involves severe curves in the leg which leave very little or no continuity of grain along the length of the leg. Typically, where grand legs are concerned, "one size fits all," with exceptions at either extreme end of the product line. I hesitate to use the term, cost cutting, on this list. No doubt, it will rankle a few, but minimizing cost is the sole reason for building ridiculously small grands, to fill that market niche. As long as there is a market demand for it, someone will build it. Frank Emerso
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC