Jon Page wrote: > Too often students are instructed that technique is force and not > finesse. > > Can you check the touch weight on his piano to get an idea of what he > expects? > The organist at the church where I do choirs part-time learned to play on on a Gulbranson spinet. After 20 years of piano, she finished as an organ major, and did graduate work at Eastman in organ. I'll stack her sight reading, musicality, nuance against many "professional" pianists. I've asked her how she did it on such a piece of junk, to which she responded, "It was all we could afford, and I wanted to do music, and so used what we had." A former organist, now and MD, and unfortunately a quadriplegic, learned on an instrument equally bad, being an excellent pianist and not so good an organist. He also commented that making music was important to him and he used what was available in his home. Strong desire to make music seems to be more important than the quality of touchweight and a fancy piano. Being a keyboard cripple, I am only to repeat the experience of others, but people seem quite often to make do with what they have for many years and not find that a detriment to making fine music. les bartlett houston
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC