> A concern I would have with that type of meter is calibration accuracy > and calibration longevity. Interesting. Exactly the concerns I have over electronic devices. I haven't yet run across anything indicating such, but I would be interested if anyone has found any evidence to the effect that the response rate or amplitude of a piece of wood moving unrestrained through repeated naturally occurring humidity ranges changes over time. >IMHO, if I were to use such a meter, I would > not use the absolute dial readout for anything definitive, but rather > when the board has equilibrated with the hot box environment. Yup, as I suggested, for the unconvinced cautious. >I wonder > if the short board length of the panel in the meter might make for a > faster equilibration than a regular soundboard panel. Very likely, but that's why you give it a day at equilibrium at a relatively low temperature for the panel to catch up, rather than cranking the temperature up to 400° until the gage reaches a certain point, and yanking the panel out. Ron N > But I do see the utility of such a meter if only the end of your hot box > opens. > > Terry Farrell
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC