Hi Dean Spent a long time looking for this exact post below... one from Nossaman I rememebered. I wanted to make sure I had it right. Several other posts I rant into from Del went along the same lines... and I almost settled on one of those. As I understand these posts... what is said is that in the high treble (assuming enough stiffness to begin with) the amount of mass is critical... more critical then added stiffness to the sound. And in the bass stiffness is more critical... once there is enough mass. Now I can be wrong... have been many times. But I dont think this is the same thing as saying you want lots of mass and low stiffness in the treble, and lots of stiffness in the bass and low mass. Rons post is just below. Its from April in 2003. It also mentions what I told Thumpy just a day or two ago... about figuring support for down bearing based on scale demands. A lot said in a few words in that post. Cheers RicB Exactly, no. Roughly, yes - in a rib crowned board. Rib stiffness is >computed with a standard beam deflection formula, like the rib was a >center loaded beam. The rib scale is calculated from the stringing scale, >with stiffness requirements being determined by tensions and bearing load. >You're trying to tailer the impedance of the soundboard assembly at any >specific point in the scale to requirements of the string scale and >bearing at that point. Stiffness control is the more critical in the >bottom half of the scale, and mass control more important in the top half. >Positioning is determined by bridge type and placement, case shape, string >scale, and whatever else you want to take into account like panel >thickness, grain angle to the belly rail, rib to panel grain angle, cutoff >bars, number of ribs, etc. Lots of decisions to make
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC