> If I consider a woofer speaker, it is designed to be very rigid/stiff to > produce a large area pressure pulse without deflecting/deforming the cone, > otherwise the pressure pulse would disintegrate. The cone is also very low > mass so that it can accelerate quickly back and forth with large amplitudes. > It is very flexible around the edges but not the cone. The cone is stiff, so it won't deform into chaos, but it's perimeter is pleated so the entire cone can move easily at large amplitude. Where's the analog in a piano if the bass soundboard is stiff? The bridge cantilever is a feeble attempt that doesn't really work, where floating the tail is a fair comparison. > This is what I would like to see a little clarification on. You and others > speak of the need for increased flexibility in the bass section. When you > say you need increased flexibility in the bass for amplitude of movement, > aren't you really saying you need the flexibility around the edges, or even > a floated edge? The panel itself needs to remain rigid or stiff, but for it > to move it has to be able to give around the perimeter. Of course. You don't have much choice on whether the panel is stiff or not. It'll be fairly stiff (along the grain) whatever you do. In a big board, the bridge is far enough from the tail that the panel has adequate flexibility. In a small piano, separating the panel from the rim in the tail supplies it. Cross grain, the ribs will be designed to accommodate the differences and supply a balance of support and flexibility as is needed and possible. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC