I'm going to go perhaps slightly off-topic with a little rant here. I'd like to suggest that metric measures are good for lots of engineering measurements, including piano regulation, but that imperial measures are better for lots of practical daily living tasks. In the UK we have a pusillanimous yellow-bellied government approach to metrication: A poor grocer was flung in jail and left to rot, just about, for selling a pound of carrots; petrol (gas) is measured at pumps in litres, BUT all motorway signs are in Miles, and road speed limits shown in Miles Per Hour. (read about the grocer at http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,422250,00.html ) A headlong rush to conform to some european legislation saw a couple of retail traders persecuted for using pounds and ounces, but at some point it dawned on governemnt that if the UK wants to continue to trade with the USA, which pretty much has little interest in metric, then it had better stick with inches and pounds, The reflection that commerical trade with the USA is enormous in quantity and value, somehow dampened the ardor of the supposed moral crusade for metric! So now we are stuck with a betwixt-and-between system. I ask students "Do you use metric or imerial" and they say "Oh metric". And when I ask "wheat height are you?" they reply "Five foot nine". Many have very little sense of weights and measures at all, in either system. If I ask them to estimate the width of the room, they don't have a clue. I show them a packet of butter or a carton of milk and ask them weight or volume, and they simply don't know. It's partly because no-one asks for stuff in small shops any more but buys pre-packed in supermarkets, but it's also because we are schizophrenic about measuuring systems in the UK. Personally I think the foot, being anthropometric, is a very useful measure. Metric has no middle value - it's ok for very small (mm) and for large (km) but it doesnt have a handy measure like the foot. My Size Ten (UK) shoe is 12 inches in length, and it's great for pacing out the measurements of a room. And to my mind, it is easier to envisage what is meant by a length of Six Feet than it is to mentally "see" 180cm (or 1.8m)because you feel mentally what one foot is. End of rant. And, finally, a question: What are there 4840 of? Best regards, David. http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,422250,00.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC