Hi Del and Terry, Terry, how did you ascertain that there was <<too much>> flex in the keys ? Del, what is wrong with calling a spade a spade ? Honestly folks... any <<improvement>> in an actions performance is wholly a result of the users reaction to the change. There is no inherent improvment.... only a change in configuration. Thing is that for every person that would equate this change with an <<improvement>> there are probably at least that many if not 10 times as many who would not. You make the action stiffer when you make it stiffer... goes without saying... if thats a good thing for the pianist in question fine... if its not...what ...are we going to get all down on the guy and snub our noses at him ? Why not just call a change a change and leave it at that .... along with making it clear to the customer what the change will do... pros and cons. Because there is always pros and cons. I'd like to know what the criteria for judging these particular keys to have to much flex are ? Terry ? Cheers RicB Have him or her go back to the August and December 1996 Journals and read the two articles I wrote about energy losses in piano actions. In one of those articles I described how to improve (I realize the idea of "improving" anything to do with the piano is subjective so perhaps I should just say "change") these keys. Basically I removed the so-called Accelerated Action "rockers" and replaced them with normal thin felt punchings. I then used the space gained to accommodate maple plates of equal thickness (4 mm comes to mind but you should check) glued to the bottom of the keys. Did wonders to "change" the performance of the action and the piano. Del
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC