[pianotech] PR follow up

[PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com]

I don't mean it as presumptuous, but presuming, yes. Based on all we've  
been discussing. Presumptuous may be a bit harsh? Although I accept it if I 
have  been.
 
P
 
 
In a message dated 8/28/2009 10:00:07 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
davidlovepianos at comcast.net writes:

 
I  think that’s presumptuous.  You don’t know what the quality of the 
tuning  was as he left it to suggest it only “adequate”. 
 
David  Love 
www.davidlovepianos.com
 
 
From:  pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On 
Behalf Of  PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 6:55  PM
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [pianotech] PR  follow up

 

 

 
In a  message dated 8/28/2009 8:34:02 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
wimblees at aol.com  writes:

I pitch  raised and fine tuned it
 
I  say,  "No you didn't. You tuned it adequately". This is my only  point, 
the confusion between fine and adequate tuning. Whatever  the causes, 
whatever the methods, whatever the skills, whatever the  piano, whatever the 
number of "passes", whatever, whatever, whatever. Maybe it  makes no difference 
whatsoever.
 

 
Either  I am dimwitted, which I accept, or I am truly being unclear, which 
I also  accept, or there is a wholesale confusion on the concept of  what 
constitutes a "fine" tuning after a radical pitch  alteration. 
 

 
P
 
  
____________________________________
 




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20090828/9dcf153b/attachment.htm>