[pianotech] Aural Tuning, a third flat

John Formsma formsma at gmail.com
Thu Jan 1 18:34:23 PST 2009


I'm wondering if there might not be something structurally wrong with the
piano.  A m3 flat on an Acro is (I guess) possible without structural
problems.  I personally haven't come across anything that flat except old
dead uprights.
Not sure exactly what the beat rates are supposed to be for a flat piano.
 If I must tune flat, I always tune like I normally would because 1) that's
my procedure, and 2) it doesn't really matter so much to me what the beat
rates are on a piano that will be kept flat. I'm certainly not losing any
sleep over it. :-)

I normally tune to A440 unless I think the piano just won't do well
there. Maybe someone else has the answer to this question.

--
JF

On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Greg Livingston
<pianotuner440 at hotmail.com>wrote:

>  Dear Friends,
>
> We have been told that the beat rate for A3-C#4 is about 9 bps; F3-A3 is
> about 7 bps; do these beat rates only apply when A4 is close to 440?
>
> If A3 on a neglected piano is closer to F#, are those beat rates the same?
>
> I recently tuned the most out-of-tune Acrosonic I've ever seen in 22 years
> of tuning.  I did my best and the piano sounds better than I'm sure it's
> sounded in years, but I didn't dare get the A anywhere near my 435 fork. I
> decided just to raise A4 a bit and tune it from that point.  Of course, if
> it slipped, it would throw everything off, but I had no other reference
> point.  I will tune it again in a few months.
>
> Can I use those traditional beat rates when the A is somewhere around 420?
> Just wondering...
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech_ptg.org/attachments/20090101/1bc91c90/attachment.html>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC