[pianotech] conventional terms

David Ilvedson ilvey at sbcglobal.net
Thu Jul 23 18:44:55 MDT 2009


So how long have RNs been around?   How long did it take for the term RN to be understood/accepted?   It takes some time...

David Ilvedson, RPT
Pacifica, CA  94044

----- Original message ----------------------------------------
From: "Tom Sivak" <tvaktvak at sbcglobal.net>
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Received: 7/23/2009 2:07:59 PM
Subject: Re: [pianotech] conventional terms


>William
>I'd have to disagree.  This credential is completely unrecognized by the public.   
>Has anyone on the list, ever, even once, had someone understand what an RPT 
>was without explaining it?   Even saying "Registered Piano Technician" always 
>evokes questions.  
>No one I've ever met, outside the tuning community itself, has ever heard the term 
>before I mentioned it in conversation.  Not once.  Maybe others have had 
>differing experiences, but that's what I've experienced.  Unfortunately.
>Tom Sivak

>--- On Thu, 7/23/09, William Monroe <bill at a440piano.net> wrote:

>From: William Monroe <bill at a440piano.net>
>Subject: Re: [pianotech] conventional terms
>To: pianotech at ptg.org
>Date: Thursday, July 23, 2009, 3:41 PM

>Right David,

>I agree.  As the spouse of a Registered Nurse, I think time develops the 
>meaning.  No one questions that RN's are educated, tested professionals.  With 
>time, the same will be said of RPT's.  And, yes, changing things now would undo a 
>lot of hard work to get our credential recognized.


>William R. Monroe
















>Tom:

> 

>This is an old, long debated
>item – check the archives.  Everyone understands that a Registered
>Nurse is educated and tested as are Registered Physical Therapists (the other
>RPTs).  There has been enough marketing effort put into RPT that any
>change would cancel out a lot of good marketing effort.

> 

>If one wants to be linguistically
>correct at all times, we’d have to change our titles about every 10 years
>since words change their meanings all the time.  

> 

>dp

> 

>David M. Porritt, RPTSNIP
>  But then, if we're going to talk terminology, my first
>  priority would be to change the term "Registered Piano
>  Technician".  This term bears no weight in the every day world.
>   It sounds like I took the time to fill out a card and now I'm
>  registered with the PTG.  Like a dog is registered with the village and
>  wears a little medallion on his collar.
>  
>  
>   
>  
>  
>  Two standard definitions of "Registered" are
>  
>  
>  "enrolled"
>  
>  
>  or
>  
>  
>  "recorded in writing"
>  
>  
>   
>  
>  
>  Does that describe accurately the status of a technician
>  who has passed his exams?  
>  
>  
>  "Technician who has been enrolled"?
>  
>  
>  "Technician who has his name recorded in
>  writing"?
>  
>  
>   
>  
>  
>  The PTG should use English terms that accurately describe
>  what it is they are trying to define.
>  
>  
>   
>  
>  
>  Tom Sivak
>  
>  
>  Chicago
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 


> 








More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC