I did use the Delignit bridge stock to cap a treble and bass bridge on a grand a few years ago. The unisons were VERY clean. Stinkin' ugly zebra stripe notches. Not easy to notch, but not terrible either. I would be inclined to use it if it weren't for the butt ugly factor. Will -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Ron Nossaman Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 8:33 PM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] Pitch change, etc. jimialeggio wrote: > I think it would be useful to try and determine if there is any > advantage of the various maple epoxy laminations over a delignit cap. > > Do we have any data on this? Not directly, but Delignit ought to make a first rate cap. The stuff sold by Delignit for bridge capping is, I think, not hard and dense enough. It's a little over 70% the density of the pinblock stock, and noticeably less hard. The only real benefits I see to epoxy/veneer laminations over Delignit pinblock stock are that it looks less like plywood because of the grain direction of the laminations, and it's less abrasive to edged tools when you notch. If you want to try a pinblock grade Delignit cap, I have 9mm material. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC