paul bruesch wrote: > With all the "competition" that most of us have out there, I think we > can pretty much charge what we want. If someone is hungry enough to tune > a square for $85, and if my back hurts just thinking about it, I'll > gladly let the $85 tuner eat today. And if I tried to charge $200 to > tune a "regular" piano, I'd get mighty hungry. Yea, but you'd die proud. That's apparently worth something. > That said, the only work I've ever turned down was either something > that's beyond my capability (concert tuning, pinblock, etc.,) work > that's way far away, and one person who's quite a distance plus his > piano is mediocre (being kind) and he's a truly bizarre in a very > uncomfortable way. And pianos being mediocre is par for the course on my > client list. I've turned down a lot of work that either wasn't within my capabilities, or implied something I couldn't deliver. I've been as careful as I can manage to not promise something I can't produce, which has cost me considerable work to those that do. From an income potential stance, it's not as profitable as promising the world and delivering the minimal, but it's a lot more morally supportable. If starving honorably proves to ultimately be the way to go, I'll let you know. So far, there are still unanswered concerns. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC