I once tuned for a woman whose Steinway Hammers were bright as a searchlight. I explained to her about voicing and she said that her previous technician told her to not let **anyone** touch those hammers. I wonder if people would have the same reluctance to making improvements if we could pull a well-regulated Steinway out of our back pocket for a side-by-side comparison. Tom Cole Ed Foote wrote: > > > On Jul 2, 2010, at 6:38 AM, Jon Page wrote: > > To which she said that she wasn't > real happy. > > > I mentioned that with the heaviness, most of her effort is wasted in > > just > > getting the key to move and that a lighter touch would give more > > control > > for tone production. BUT 'She has the most wonderful teacher who > > taught > > her the best technique and she can handle it'. > > > > I could see that no amount of logic was going to steer her away from > > her > > preconceived notions. > > I get my best results when I point out to them that they are not > getting their money's worth, that the piano is > only performing at say, 70% of its potential. Draw an analogy like > having a highly tuned Ferrari with tires that are half deflated. They > are being CHEATED of the full someway experience! Maybe sometimes I > mention that the piano is ok for things like hymns or pop music, but > if someone is going to try and play Chopin, the piano is going to be > the limiting factor,real quick. > If they are serious pianists, and some of the sure things are > there, (jacks way distal, screaming springs, erratic pinning, maybe > 1/4" of drop and let-off, etc.), I can tell them that if there is not > a night and day difference in how controllable their piano is, they > won't have to pay. It is almost like shooting fish in a barrel, > though, some will not budge, no matter what you offer. > Regards, > Ed
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC