Different cars have different flat rates for certain jobs because of varying levels of complication as you suggest. However if it should take 5 hours to change a water pump and the mechanic works slowly that day and it takes him 7, do you want to be billed the extra two hours? I doubt it. With tuning a piano, however, its a bit different. The time it takes to tune a piano whether its a spinet or a grand doesn't generally vary that much assuming you are at the same starting point. That being said, I've tuned pianos in 15 minutes because there wasn't much that was out. Should I charge them 1/4 my rate because it normally takes an hour? Anyway, that's why my appointments are based on time. You get an hour of my time for $xxx. In that time I can tune your piano and a bit more depending on a variety of factors. If it's a more difficult tuning I end up with less extra time or no extra time. If I get there and the piano is spot on then I can spend the time doing other things (or should I just leave and not charge them???). I think that's a fair system and removes this whole controversy. David Love www.davidlovepianos.com From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of tnrwim at aol.com Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 6:27 AM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] Ethics was Re: business As a for instance, the timing belt / water pump job on your car may take a competent technician an hour to do and $100 in parts. Or, if you have a car like mine, it may take 5 hours and $300 in parts. Should auto technicians charge the same ammount for both cars because they're both "timing belt / water pump" jobs? I don't think so. Bringing it to piano work, would you expect to pay the same ammount to replace a pinblock on a typical grand as on an old curved, one piece, open face Knabe? Ummm, no. The reason the mechanic charges more to replace a difficult water pump, and the reason you charge more to replace is curved pin block, is because it takes longer. The longer we take to do a job, the more we should charge. Many do choose to standardize their tuning fees in the consideration that many of their piano tunings will be comparable in the ammount of time it will take and the difficulty involved. And many do already charge extra for things like pitch raises, where more time / effort is called for. I don't hear anyone crying foul over that. One of the problems we have in our industry is, we try to combine a set fee, (tuning, and pitch raising), with work that is done at an hourly rate, (regulation, voicing, etc.) The way I have solved this discrepancy is to make a list of all the jobs I do, and estimate approximately how long it "normally" takes me to do them, including tuning. I try to stick to this list as best I can, deviating occasionally when I think a particular job will take me a little longer. If there is a job I have never done before, I try to estimate how long it will take. If it takes me longer, I usually eat the time. If it takes me less time, I reduce the amount I charge. I realize there are some techs that charge by the "job", and ask for that amount, regardless of how long it took, because the customer paid for the job to be done, and is happy to pay that amount. I don't work that way. I sell my time, and if a job takes me less than I originally estimated, I give the customer a break. Wim
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC