I think the problem is this Board of Directors is too emotionally invested in the new and improved product because they have spent so much time, energy, and (our)$$ on it. The only hope would be to elect a new board who isn't so invested in it. I keep thinking that we've had a poorly designed/manufactured piano delivered to us and the leadership keeps trying to convince us that it just needs a little more regulating and "playing in". I would like to see the whole thing scrapped and start over with something that works and that the membership wants. Ryan On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Ron Nossaman <rnossaman at cox.net> wrote: > On 12/31/2011 1:02 PM, David Boyce wrote: > >> Yes indeed. We'll all be 'unsubscribed' when this list is finally >> terminated, after all.... >> >> David. >> www.davidboyce.co.uk >> >> Aw, shucks, hang around until the list is history. I plan to. >>> >>> Joy! >>> >>> Elwood >>> >> > > And as I keep attempting to point out, if we could get anyone responsible > to take interest in *requiring* HL to make their "legacy" option actually > work, we would have equivalent function in the new system and would have no > real need of either the old pianotech list, or HL's much admired social > networking site. > Ron N > -- Ryan Sowers, RPT Puget Sound Chapter Olympia, WA www.pianova.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20111231/ad707130/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC