[pianotech] [OT] Stuff Which Should Really Be on PTG-L

[Joe Goss]

Humm Sounds a little like  the health care program.
>>g<<

Joe Goss BSMusEd MMusEd RPT
imatunr at srvinet.com
www.mothergoosetools.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Nossaman" <rnossaman at cox.net>
To: <pianotech at ptg.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2011 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: [pianotech] [OT] Stuff Which Should Really Be on PTG-L


> On 7/2/2011 2:44 PM, Dale Probst wrote:
>>
>> I know that the Member Max/Higher Logic interface was how we came to HL.
>
>
>
>> I'm pretty sure from my conversations with Board members that they want
>> the best they can get.
>
> For whom? That's the core of this discussion.
>
>
> I have been told that if HL doesn't work, we will
>> go another direction.
>
> Again, doesn't work for whom? The pianotech forum already doesn't work for 
> a considerable number of us, but I don't see any signs of movement 
> addressing basic function. And is "another direction" another $75K or more 
> spent without care as to whether the list communities will find the 
> replacement adequate? We've all been told a lot of stuff, but it's all 
> very fuzzy and unaccountable.
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This thing showed up in February as one giant impenetrable ink cloud. From 
> then to now, we just a couple of days ago got figures on what it cost, and 
> still can't seem to get information other than "we're working on it". 
> Since our questions mostly concern the lists and the answers are either 
> hopelessly vague or office administration specific, will we ever know what 
> "it" is?
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ron N
>