Hi Daniel, On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Daniel Carlton <carltonpiano at sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Anyone care to say anything about drilled capo bars? Has anyone besides > manufacturers tried this, and had success or not? How exactly is it supposed > to contribute to “exceptionally long sustain?” Could you please explain this. Where are these holes drilled? How large, aprox.? Do you mean drilled from underneath in order to tap in special agraffes or other hardware? What mfg. is doing this? Are these capo bars unusually massive? And who is claiming "exceptionally long sustain"? If the "who" in this is too sensitive for you to divulge, what more can you tell us? > By removing mass from the > bar/giving the bar more freedom to vibrate? I'm not an engineer so help me > out here, please. While awaiting answers above, in general, allowing (or encouraging) the capo bar freedom to vibrate is counter-physics for increasing sustain. String energy will find a happy friend to dance with (the capo being a real mover and shaker) and the two will complete the dance sooner than later. Although plates, bar, struts and rims do vibrate, by far most of the vibratory action going on should be consolidated in the strings and soundboard assemblies. If there exists any objective proof or data to the claims above may we know of it? Should proof exist, then something very unusual is going on. In any case, if the practice is working on the Battleship series of grands doesn't mean it will transport well to rebuilding shops. Still, I may have to get out my big momma, mega-torque drill. -- Nick Gravagne, RPT AST Mechanical Engineering
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC