At 11:24 -0600 10/03/2011, Daniel Carlton wrote: >Anyone care to say anything about drilled capo bars? Has anyone >besides manufacturers tried this, and had success or not? How >exactly is it supposed to contribute to "exceptionally long >sustain?" By removing mass from the bar/giving the bar more freedom >to vibrate? I'm not an engineer... The whole idea of a capo bar is that it should be massive and immovable. This mass and immovability is critical in the extreme treble, where many makers do use a cast-in front bridge (capo). Makers who use agraffes almost always used a special more massive agraffe for the top two sections and good results can be had with those. The bar has several advantages over the agraffe but in all cases is far more massive than it needs to be to perform its function, simply because it's convenient to cast it that way. Drilling holes in it ( and I've never seen or hear of such a thing) is not going to reduce the mass to anywhere near the critical level and is not going to make a scrap of difference to the function of the bridge as a massive immovable termination that absorbs no energy from the string. Perhaps they think it looks pretty. JD
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC