Yes, that's right of course, went too far with that idea. So then why exactly does muting the front duplex kill the tone? Even a light muting in which the rocking motion is presumably unimpeded. What does the front duplex contribute in that case (when it's unmated) and how does it contribute. Similarly, why does muting the front duplex in a piano with a very short duplex not kill the tone nor does the tone suffer, seemingly, from having a very short front duplex. David Love www.davidlovepianos.com >...The front duplex by the same token probably receives some energy >from the changes in air pressure from the surrounding air. The >difference is that the front scale is not attached directly to a >flexible diaphragm as the soundboard but rather the plate which is >acoustically dead, in effect. Doesn't that make sense? I'd say, as I think others have recently said, that the vibration of the front section of a string comes from direct mechanical transmission of stress in the speaking length of the same string across the front bridge by what has been called a 'rocking' motion or see-saw effect and that any direct excitation by the sound waves in the air is infinitesimal. And this can quite easily be demonstrated by experiment.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC