Some good ideas and interpolations here, David. Since you usually invite comments and modifications, I would like to sort out a couple of things later, but need to get to work. Someone else may jump in before I can return. NG On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:26 AM, David Love <davidlovepianos at comcast.net>wrote: > Here's another way to look at it. The amount of potential energy in the > system is represented by the sum of the compression in the soundboard system > (as Nick describes) plus the amount that can be delivered by the hammer, > much like a wrecking ball at the peak of its arc poised to crash into the > building. Different systems may have those two sources in different > proportion. For the same energy output you might have one system that relies > on a greater amount stored in the soundboard and one that relies on a > greater amount delivered from the hammer. The differences in the way the > energy is released by virtue of that proportional difference and how that > manifests itself acoustically might go some way toward answering the JD > question and the notion of "bloom", whatever that is . With more energy > stored in the board the total system relies less on hammer input and the > same total release of energy can be achieved with less energy coming from > the hammer. When you think about the differences between that Steinway we > loved with very light and soft hammers that seems to come alive at the > slightest touch and the Yamaha that requires some greater input of energy it > all seems to fall into place. > > David Love > www.davidlovepianos.com > (sent from bb) > ------------------------------ > *From: * Nicholas Gravagne <ngravagne at gmail.com> > *Sender: * pianotech-bounces at ptg.org > *Date: *Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:36:53 -0700 > *To: *<pianotech at ptg.org> > *ReplyTo: * pianotech at ptg.org > *Subject: *Re: [pianotech] What is bloom, > > I think so. This has to be the heart and soul of the whole matter. Voicing, > then, evens things out and brings out the best balance, but the choice of > hammers is important, after which the voicer can only work with the > foundation offered by the belly. > > Potential energy (PE) is achieved, and is proportional to, the measurable > compression of the soundboard assembly under the force of downbearing. We > already know that a string is useless until it is stretched to a high > tension; PE is introduced and ready to be tapped. Likewise, hammer felt > stretched and compressed over a molding contains PE, also ready to be > tapped. PE becomes Kinetic Energy (KE) when tapped, or set in motion. The > more PE stored, the more KE is available. > > Clearly, too much of good thing spoils the effect. There are limits and > points of diminishing returns. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20110318/9d5b8c75/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC