Good posts from a number of folks, but I don't see why the piano owner should be subject to months of waiting before they can be assured they have a functioning musical instrument without a cloud hanging over it. I think encouraging the insurance company to replace the instrument (or at least the pre-claim value) is the most straightforward way to proceed. If the technician sees potential value in the now problematic instrument, he could suggest a "salvage value", and make an offer. If he's "lucky" he might come out ahead (or a higher bidder might get "stuck" if he is overly optimistic and things turn bad). Patrick Draine On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Mike Spalding <mike.spalding1 at frontier.com>wrote: > Rob, > > Here's an excerpt from an inspection report I wrote in Oct. 2010 for a U1 > that was in a flooded basement. In this case, the insurance company was > willing to wait 6 months to settle, and the piano remained in the owners' > home. If you like it, feel free to lift the parts that work for you. > > "The piano was partially submerged (approximately 4” above bottom of > knee-board, 8” above floor) during a recent flood.The owner minimized the > damage by 1) immediately lifting the piano up on wood blocks, 2) cleaning, > drying, and dehumidifying the room and the piano with2 room dehumidifiers.At > the time I inspected the piano, the internal relative humidity of the piano > was 55%. > > All damage from immersion will not manifest immediately; it generally will > appear in 3 phases: > > 1Immediate damage from the saturation and swelling of the wood, such as > rust, glue failure, finish failure.This is what my recent inspection looked > at. > > 2Damage duringthe drying out process due to shrinkage of the wood, > including cracks, glue failure, finish failure.It is too soon to see this > damage, as the piano has not totally dried out yet. > > 3Damage during subsequent years, due to weakening of materials during the > immersion and initial drying.In effect, this is a shortening of the life of > the piano:repairs which might be normal during the latter years of a piano’s > life simply come earlier.Fear in the market place of this type of damage > will never go away – a piano that has been in water suffers a permanent > reduction in its market value.The likelihood of some structural failures can > be reduced by reinforcing some glued joints with screws or other mechanical > fasteners, and replacing critical metal parts, such as strings or casters, > which have begun to corrode. > > Because the piano still retains significant moisture, my recent inspection > only covers phase 1 damage, which is minimal.The most significant findings > are rusted strings and casters, and swollen wood.The detailed itemization is > attached.My findings are completely consistent with the report by Xxxx Yyyyy > RPT Dated 8-10-2010.At this time, no repairs are recommended. > > I recommend that the piano be inspected again in January or February, at > which time the humidity in the piano should be at it’s seasonal minimum.At > that time we can put together a recommendation of repairs to phase 1 and > phase 2 damage, and preventive action aimed at phase 3.Alternatively, if the > insurance company will allow, the piano can be observed for a longer period > of time to see what additional damage might manifest." > > > > > On 10/13/2011 2:47 PM, Rob McCall wrote: > >> So, does anyone have any proven methods of dealing with the insurance and >> the flood mitigation company that want solutions yesterday? The insurance >> company wants to pay it out, the owner wants their piano back, and the flood >> company doesn't want to store it. >> >> I have no problem telling them that it needs to sit for awhile to see what >> will come up in the next few months, but it would be nice to have some tried >> and true method, verbiage, or something to drive the point home. Or maybe I >> can send them an estimate for what I found, plus some sort of disclaimer or >> caveat to cover the issues (and my rear) that may (will) come up 4-6 months >> down the road? >> >> Regards, >> >> Rob >> >> On Oct 13, 2011, at 05:05 , Mike Spalding wrote: >> >> Rob, >>> >>> Now that you've made a thorough inspection, thoroughly documented with >>> notes and photos, the thing to do is wait through the dry season ( or longer >>> if the insurance company will allow it) then re-inspect the piano to see if >>> any new damage shows up. >>> >>> Mike >>> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20111014/0aa1a972/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC