[pianotech] Old can of worms (was Re: tunelab vs verituner)

[Jason Kanter]

Well, Ron, there was the classic Virgil vs Coleman tune-off that spawned a
lot of discussion about Virgil's aural method as superior in some respects.

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Ron Nossaman <rnossaman at cox.net> wrote:

> On 5/11/2012 12:09 PM, Ed Foote wrote:
>
>  Used as a repository of our finest tuning on a given piano, the
>> ETD allows users to recreate that tuning later, and as we use it
>> repeatedly, we can polish it till it shines, allowing us a degree of
>> refinement that the aural tuner doesn't have access to.
>>
>
> This, to my mind and for those in a position where they're tuning the same
> pianos repeatedly at short intervals, is the golden reason for ETD use.
>
>
>
>  I don't understand those that think they produce a superior tuning using
>> just their ears,as opposed to another tuner that is using his ears AND a
>> machine.
>>
>
> Me either, nor do I recall anyone - *ever* - claiming that in any of these
> discussions. ????
> Ron N
>



-- 
*| || ||| || ||| || ||| || ||| || ||| || ||| || |||*
jason's cell 425 830 1561
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20120511/0823a8f2/attachment.htm>