[pianotech] Old can of worms (was Re: tunelab vs verituner)

[Jason Kanter]

I was not making a claim, simply responding to your "I don't recall"
statement here:

*I don't understand those that think they produce a superior tuning using*

*just their ears,as opposed to another tuner that is using his ears AND a*

*machine.*

*
*
*Me either, nor do I recall anyone - *ever* - claiming that in any of these
discussions. ????*
*Ron N *

Personally, I side with Ron Koval - use the ETD, evaluate with your ears,
make adjustments to the ETD settings accordingly. A marvelous tool. I use
both Tunelab and Verituner. Tunelab is better for the first pass, on
anything that's more than 2 cents south. Verituner is awesome for fine
tuning. Both are robots that need intelligent instructions.


On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Ron Nossaman <rnossaman at cox.net> wrote:

> On 5/11/2012 1:28 PM, Jason Kanter wrote:
>
>> Well, Ron, there was the classic Virgil vs Coleman tune-off that spawned
>> a lot of discussion about Virgil's aural method as superior in some
>> respects.
>>
>
> Meaning what? As I recall, Jim got about half of the votes too, and
> neither of these folks is representative of either aural or ETD tuners.
> Both are rather extraordinary.
> Ron N
>



-- 
*| || ||| || ||| || ||| || ||| || ||| || ||| || |||*
jason's cell 425 830 1561
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20120511/73c1bafb/attachment.htm>