[pianotech] Expanding leads

[johnparham at piano88.com]

Terry,
When the discussion came around last time, and that was posted, some of
us read it. There was someone who continued to make statements that
revealed that he had not taken the time to read it. I was frustrated by
that. So it was not science, it was an encouragement to whoever did not
read the article last time to please invest the time and read the
article this time.
-John Parham

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [pianotech] Expanding leads
> From: Terry Farrell <mfarrel2 at tampabay.rr.com>
> Date: Wed, March 13, 2013 8:13 am
> To: pianotech at ptg.org
>
>
> John and Ron both. What a way to completely ruin a truly wonderfully aimless, conclusion-less, pointless discussion that we've had many times before and were enjoying once again. Once a year or so I'll think of you two, all the fun we could have had again, and being left with nothing but plain facts staring us in the face. Why do you have to interject science into a technical discussion like this? The "feels-like" method provides so much more entertainment - and it can forever go round & round & round!
>
> Ba-fooey on you two!
>
> Terry Farrell
>
> On Mar 13, 2013, at 1:14 AM, <johnparham at piano88.com> <johnparham at piano88.com> wrote:
>
> > Allen,
> >
> > Thank you for reposting this website from the U.S. Navy. The last time
> > this subject came up someone posted the same link, and I read the
> > article from beginning to end. I recommend everyone read it if you
> > haven't already.
> >
> > I favor discussing research over guessing most days.
> >
> > -John Parham