David, Below are my 'comments' from an email response to a Eudora survey. It more or less sums everything up. In addition, and like you, I have early pianotech archives stored in various sub-folders. I quit storing and unsubscribed when the p'tech list became "less technical", shortly after the BYU hosting terminated. That's a different story. However, even with my folder hierarchy, Eudora's find routine was -primitive-. The search has finally improved in 4.3.2 though. [begin partial email response to Qualcomm] "Thank you for providing free space for comments. I don't want a subscription to anything. Eudora Lite did not influence my purchase of Eudora Pro. I didn't like Lite. I don't like 'Pro' either -- I tolerate it. I don't like the name of the software. I hid the box so I wouldn't have to see the ugly logo, but it still shows up on my screen during the painfully slow loading. I do like the 'Qualcomm' corporate name though! I purchased the 'Pro' version for a couple of reasons. One, because it had MAPI links to other software that I -do- like. Two, I read where the interface and functionality had improved in v4.0. They were wrong. I was wrong. I'm still learning...why can't you?" [end quoted material] In case my response to Eudora sounds cynical, that's by design. It comes with the turf for Newton and I. <grin> At 09:28 PM 11/19/00 -0500, you wrote: >Jim- >What is it you do not like about Eudora? I'm rather intractably entwined >with it since I've saved almost the last three years worth of pianotech @ >caut in it. > >David Skolnik
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC