> It will never happen though, >because > > they wouldn't consider rebuilding everyone's favorite piano of the lot. > > >Having spent a year in Kansas, I know what that climate does to soundboards, >especially in institutions! North Carolina weather is easier on pianos. And techs' ideas of what constitutes a viable or dead soundboard are similarly diverse everywhere you go. >She has already put several thousand dollars into it, and I'll >begin by tossing that work. Not uncommon, sadly. > Since this will be a two stage rebuild (action >now, pinblock and restring in a year or two), I'm concerned to see as far up >the road as possible, and not cause her to invest still more in a lost >cause. I don't think it's a lost cause, but it could use some design modifications. This could be a nice piano with the right work, or a repeat of what it was. > > Should one want to? What is the detriment inherent in using a capo instead > > of agraffes? Why is this a bad thing? > > >That's one of my questions! What do you think? > >Ed There's no reason I know of that agraffes would be a better termination system than a V bar in a capo if the capo is reasonably heavy and stiff. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC