This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Oops-
I meant to write backcheck, not damper....that happens more and more =
these days. Anyway, it was a great class about backchecks. And the =
action geometry is also very good. =20
You could maybe set up a bunch of backcheck problems that way. And it =
would be cheaper to buy a Steinway action model (naive thought, there). =
The thing about doing it with a full action is that you wouldn't be able =
to see it...which is the way these darling problems happen. I guess you =
could throw a curtain over the action model.
Ed
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Horace Greeley=20
To: College and University Technicians=20
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: bobbling hammers, again
Hi, Ed,
At 06:36 PM 10/2/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Hello, Horace, where've you been?
Under a rock....
Richard Davenport's damper class is very, very good. It is mostly =
about installing new dampers properly.
Hmmm - the class I was thinking about was one for which he had built a =
special action model with modified parts so that any number of variables =
could be achieved. I think it was called: "What if?"...but, memory =
fails.
What I'm imagining is an action that is rigged to have as many of =
the subtle frustrations (such as Wim's backcheck problems) as could be =
fitted into 88 keys. The object would be to learn to diagnose quickly, =
mostly by touch, without pulling the stack.
Richard's model was only one or two keys (I think). =20
I like the idea of a full action, but wonder about the visibility of =
the parts/relationships.
If anyone has a Steinway action about to be ditched, I would =
undertake the rigging!
What? Throw away the Crown Jewel of Perfection of piano manufacture? =
Get thee behind me! Block my hammer!
Still, the visual does have some degree of visceral appeal...
Horace
Ed Sutton
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Horace Greeley=20
To: College and University Technicians=20
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: bobbling hammers, again
Ed,
Something on this order used to be a part of a class that Richard =
Davenport was teaching a few years back. Perhaps he is still teaching =
it from time to time.
Horace
At 05:28 PM 10/1/2003 -0400, you wrote:
If someone has a spare D or B action, it would be a great model =
to create all the backcheck problems we've been posting on this thread, =
then use in a demo class. =20
Ed S.=20
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Wimblees@aol.com=20
To: caut@ptg.org=20
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 5:06 PM=20
Subject: Re: bobbling hammers, again
In a message dated 10/1/03 3:58:02 PM Central Daylight Time, =
ed440@mindspring.com writes:
Wim-
Along with what Jeff is saying, check (feel) if the nap of the =
buckskin is=20
reversed, or if the backcheck head is slightly loose on the =
wire. Also check the=20
bottom edge and corners of the hammer; just a slight touch =
with a sandpaper file=20
to remove a sharp corner might make it work.
I am going to look at the wire, to make sure it is tight in the =
key. I will also look at the nap of the buckskin. I have already sanded =
the bottom edge of the tail to remove the sharp edge.=20
Are you making a laminated checklist of all these suggestions? =
You could teach a=20
class next year. Or sell the list. ;-)
I am saving all the suggestions for future references. I don't =
know if I will have enough material to teach a full class, but maybe a =
mini class. As with all educational material, the information will be =
free for the asking. :)
Wim=20
Ed Sutton
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/8c/9b/38/e0/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC