Alan, If you want to calculate a target BW to make say a 5.8 R the calculation would be: BW=SWxR+WBW-FW I took your figures and plugged in 5.8 for R and 9.0 for WBW (assuming that it would drop a gram by moving the capstan/heel further out on the wippen. The results are: Note SW FW Bwtarget 1 12.0 41.0 38 2 11.6 41.6 35 9 11.2 40.7 33 10 11.2 37.4 37 16 11.3 37.0 38 17 11.4 37.2 38 28 10.1 25.6 42 29 10.4 30.5 39 40 9.8 25.0 41 41 9.7 26.9 38 52 8.9 24.2 36 53 8.6 24.3 35 64 8.2 15.6 41 65 8.0 18.1 37 76 7.2 1.9 49 77 7.3 1.5 50 87 5.4 -5.2 46 88 5.5 -8.6 49 So you could float the capstan boat for any of these samples and find a position that makes the BW match the target and that will indicate the position for a 5.8 ratio. If you can regulate dip/blow for that position then go for it! Another approach (calculation free) would be to set the dip to a maximum say 10.5mm/.413" and find the position farthest out on the wippen that allows for minimum after touch with a short blow. This would give you the capstan position for the lowest regulatable Strike Weight Ratio. Once you find the new position you can assess the ratio level and determine if you need to alter hammer weight accordingly. If the result of a few samples comes out to say 6.0 or higher then your going to have to lighten the hammers to 1/2 medium or lower unless you can improve the geometry to yield a more efficient action. If it's a Chickering expect the unexpected! It is my observation that the most efficient actions have the highest distance to weight ratio. In other words the actions that multiply distance (and speed) the most and with the lowest weight ratio by proportion are the best. I don't have a set up for measuring movement of the hammer vs key but as I have said checking the dip/blow result gives the answer we need. David Stanwood
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC