> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Hi Greg, Here at UNM we have been using Roland for about ten years. I have nothing to do with the lab, but there have been no complaints that I know of, and they seem to have held up well. We started with a hybrid loan program, where they placed 15 or so with the understanding we had to buy a couple every semester, until we finally owned them all. The group piano teacher loves them, says she wouldn=B9t have any other brand. Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico On 9/21/05 11:44 AM, "Greg Granoff" <gjg2@humboldt.edu> wrote: > Hello CAUTs, > =20 > Anyone out there have any observations/experiences with keyboard teaching= labs > by any other maker than Yamaha? > Some of you techs at larger schools may not deal with it at all, but here= at > HSU it has gradually become my responsibility to keep basic functions of = our > 26 station Yamaha keyboard teaching lab alive. Our lab is 15 years old a= nd > its age is showing; replacing broken headphones, removing erasure debris,= and > cleaning off note names written on keys by dimbulb students is no longer > adequate to meet the need. We'd consider another Yamaha lab, but I would= love > to have some input regarding other makers setups from a reliability/usefu= lness > standpoint. Many aspects of this Yamaha lab seem to me unnecessarily > proprietary and not really designed to stand up under daily abuse. > Again, I realize many of you may not deal with this sort of thing at all,= but > I thought I'd try. > =20 > Thanks in advance. > =20 > Greg Granoff > Humboldt State University >=20 ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/b9/03/94/aa/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC