[CAUT] WAPIN INSTALLATION: LIVE!

Jim Busby jim_busby at byu.edu
Sat Nov 4 17:48:08 MST 2006


Tim,

I've only seen the three pin Wapin configuration and thought that was
THE standard. Is there a web or pictures that show the two pin method? 

Thanks.
Jim Busby BYU

-----Original Message-----
From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of
Tim Coates
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 5:42 PM
To: College and University Technicians
Subject: Re: [CAUT] WAPIN INSTALLATION: LIVE!

Doesn't explain why a two pin Wapin configuration works just as well as 
the Wapin three pin configuration.  Two pin configuration has the same 
mass as a traditional pinning.

We prefer the Wapin three pin configuration for margin of safety.  The 
safety is the undo criticism from techs who find any little aspect to 
find fault.  It really doesn't matter for any other reason.  And yes, 
stability tests have been done.

Tim Coates

On Nov 4, 2006, at 5:32 PM, Joe And Penny Goss wrote:

> Ponder this, what if simply adding the extra pin is adding mass and
the
> cause for the tonal change.
> Joe Goss RPT
> Mother Goose Tools
> imatunr at srvinet.com
> www.mothergoosetools.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "RicB" <ricb at pianostemmer.no>
> To: <caut at ptg.org>
> Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 1:36 PM
> Subject: [CAUT] WAPIN INSTALLATION: LIVE!
>




More information about the caut mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC