Thanks Ron O
One thing that I was really suprised about in tear down was how hard it
was to pull the pins on the old bridge. My forte' is definitely not
wood recognition at this point so I would be unable to tell the
difference between Sycamore and HardRock Maple... but perhaps the
origional was maple after all given how good its condition was ?
I had gone down to Denmark thinking we would be making a beech bridge,
but let myself get swayed (for the better I think) in going with the
hard rock maple. It sure looks wonderful thats for sure.
I still have to make a final decision on the string lengths / scale and
then comes lay out and notching. Maple seems like nice stuff to work
with when it comes to notching... which prompts me to ask what in folks
experience is the best wood to work with for notching. Curious as hell
now that I am on this path :)
Cheers
RicB
Ric,
Regarding the wood which was used for the bridge,
it probably isn't maple, but Sycamore. Both are
from the family Acer, but one is sacharum (rock
maple) with an ADD of 7.0 to 7.2 gr/cc, while the
other is Acer pseudoplatanus, with an ADD of
around 6.0 gr/ cc. Bösendorfer used to use
pseudoplatanus for their bridges, and it was
inclined to allow the bridge pins to stand up.
They both look the same but the rock maple is the
real McCoy.
Samual Wolfenden wrote about maple being weaker
than Beech. He was referring to psuedoplatanus
when he was writing about maple. He knew.
Best regards,
Ron O.
--
OVERS PIANOS - SYDNEY
Grand Piano Manufacturers
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC