I've now got so many good suggestions, I'm going to conduct an experiment: I'll find the brightest practice room I can and pick out the four brightest of the bright in the upper-mid treble section. I'll try Pianotek, fabric softener and water, steam, and rubbing alcohol and then check them out the next day. I'll let you all know what wins!! Have a great weekend!! Thanks for all the suggestions. Paul Alan Crane <alan.crane at wichita.edu> Sent by: caut-bounces at ptg.org 03/23/2007 12:32 PM Please respond to College and University Technicians <caut at ptg.org> To College and University Technicians <caut at ptg.org>, caut at ptg.org cc Subject Re: [CAUT] hammer softener At 09:46 AM 3/23/2007, Paul T Williams wrote: > >Does anyone know what is in the Pianotek Hammer softener? I was >wondering if there is some homemade stuff that would work as >well. They only sell it in 8 Oz bottles and until budgets increase >(ha ha) to replace lots of hard, worn, really really bright hammers >et al, I need to use this stuff. Hi Paul, Several years ago, right before steam became popular for softening/voicing, there was a substantial interest in fabric softener based formulations for softening hammers. I still use the stuff sometimes. Mine is home made; don't know what Pianotek's formulation is. The formula I use is: Downey Free* (no dyes, no scent) fabric softener, and isopropyl alcohol (70%) in a 1/8 ratio. (That's one part softener / eight parts alcohol) * the particular brand is (I think) not important Regards, Alan B. Crane, RPT School of Music Wichita State University alan.crane at wichita.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20070323/f5e86ecf/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC